University of Minnesota
University of Minnesota
College of Biological Sciences
http://www.cbs.umn.edu/

Dataset

Nutrient Network. A cross-site investigation of bottom-up control over herbaceous plant community dynamics and ecosystem function. - Experiment 247


Aboveground Standing Crop Biomass

Years Available: 2007 - 2020

Principle Investigators

Seabloom, Eric
Harpole, Stan
Borer, Elizabeth

View All Experiment and Dataset Methods

Environmental Data Initiative data package

EDI Package ID DOI
knb-lter-cdr.571.9
doi:10.6073/pasta/7c815175fc378270b6848351e43275b9

ATTRIBUTES

FieldNameDefinitionUnitCode
1yearyear biomass observed
2site_nameExpanded Nutrient Network site name
3site_codeNutrient Network site codecdcr.us=Cedar Creek USA
4year_trtplot treatment progression status 0=pretreatment observation, 1=first observations after treatments, 2=2nd year after treatment, 3=3rd year after treatment, 4=4th year after treatment, 5=5th year after treatment, 6=6th year after treatment, 7=7th year after treatment
5trtapplied treatment combinationControl=no treatment, K=potassium, P=phosphate, N=nitrogen, PK=phosphate potassium, NK=nitrogen potassium, NP=nitrogen phosphate, NPK=nitrogen phosphate potassium, Fence=Fence, NPK Fence=nitrogen phosphate potassium fence
6blockblock numbernumber
7plotplot numbernumber
8subplotsubplot letter
9NNitrogen treatment1=Nitrogen applied as timed-release urea [NH2)2CO2], 0=no N applied
10PPhosphate treatment1=10 gramsPerMeterSquaredPerYear as triple-super phosphate [Ca(H2PO4)2], 0=no P applied
11KPotassium AND initial micronutrient treatment1=10 gramsPerMeterSquaredPerYear as potassium sulfate [K2SO4] AND one-time application in treatment year 1 of 100 gramsPerMeterSquared of a micronutrient mix of Fe (15%) S (14%) Mg (1.5%) Mn (2.5%) Cu (1%) Zn (1%) B (0.2%) and Mo (0.05%), 0=no K or micronutrients applied
12ExcloseFence enclosure treatment1=plot surrounded by 230-cm-tall fence with the lower 90 cm surrounded by 1-cm woven wire mesh (hardware cloth) with a 30-cm outward-facing flange, 0=no enclosure
13Nitrogen added to plotAmount of nitrogen from fertilizer added to the plotgramsPerMeterSquaredPerYear
14Aboveground biomassdried mass (g/m2)gramsPerSquareMeter
15categoryplant functional group
16liveplant biomass status1=live plant material, 0=litter standing dead or downed woody debris
 

SAMPLE DATASET

yearsite_namesite_codeyear_trttrtblockplotsubplotNPKExcloseNitrogen fertilizer added to plotAboveground biomasscategorylive
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NPK+Fence11A11111036.1FORB1
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NPK+Fence11A11111080.9GRAMINOID1
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NPK+Fence11A111110123.85LITTER0
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NP12A11001016.8FORB1
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NP12A110010187.250005GRAMINOID1
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NP12A11001093.950005LITTER0
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NPK13D1110104.15FORB1
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NPK13D11101044.25LITTER0
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0NPK13D111010160.599995GRAMINOID1
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0K14B0010036.05LITTER0
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0K14B0010082.45GRAMINOID1
2007Cedar Creek LTERcdcr.us0K14B0010030.45FORB1
                

Download dataset acue247
Nutrient Network. A cross-site investigation of bottom-up control over herbaceous plant community dynamics and ecosystem function.: Aboveground Standing Crop Biomass

*Read more about EML


Report errors in data files here.